New Version of Mandatory Public File Document Released

An updated version of "The Public and Broadcasting," a Commission publication which all broadcasters must place in their public inspection files, was released on April 24.  All broadcasters must replace the former version of the document with the revised version immediately and also must be prepared to provide copies to any member of the public who requests one.
 
The Commission also announced that it will provide two "Broadcast Information Specialists," one in the Media Bureau's Audio Division and the other in its Video Division, to serve as contact points for the public to answer questions regarding becoming involved in the Commission's processes.
 
Anyone with questions regarding the updated version of "The Public and Broadcasting" and/or other questions concerning local public file requirements are welcome to call their FHH attorney for more information.

Court Questions BPL Rules

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, responding to an appeal brought by the Amateur Radio Relay League (ARRL),  today sent parts of the Broadband-over-Power-Line (BPL) Rules back to the FCC for a second look.  The challenged rules remain in force in the meantime.

The court was unhappy with two aspects of the FCC's decision-making process.

First:  Among the many technical studies that played a part in the proceeding were five performed by the FCC itself.  The FCC placed these in the public docket, but redacted some passages that it said were "preliminary or partial results or staff opinions."  It claimed no reliance on those passages in reaching its conclusions.  But the court, having seen the redacted portions, suspected they might contain evidence that could call the rules into question.  For that reason it ordered the FCC to publish the material and to receive public comment on it.

Second, the FCC had carried over from earlier rules an "extrapolation factor" of 40 dB/decade at frequencies below 30 MHz.  (The number is used for equating measurements taken at various distances.)  The court agreed with ARRL that the mathematical models used to justify the value relied on measurements from other technologies, and further, that the FCC had failed to explain why it disregarded empirical studies in the record showing that 40 dB/decade was inappropriate.  The FCC must now either justify or change the extrapolation factor.

On two other points, the court sided with the FCC.  ARRL had argued that the FCC inadequately explained why it allowed BPL to be deployed on an unlicensed basis, notwithstanding a supposed admission that BPL could cause harmful interference to licensed mobile amateur users.  The court detected no such admission; to the contrary, it cited FCC findings that such interference would not occur.  And the court held that the FCC had adequately explained its decision not to confine BPL to 30-50 MHz, where the amateurs have no operations.

The next step in the process will be a request for comments from the FCC.  Considering that the original BPL proceeding drew 8,000 submissions, many of them strongly worded, the FCC is bracing itself for this new round, which is likely to be at least as contentious.

Huge Fines on Analog TVs

Readers of this blog know that full-power analog TV stations will go off the air for good on February 17, 2009, leaving only their digital counterparts.  Sadly, though, not everyone is so well-informed.  Come that Tuesday morning, a lot of people will turn on their trusty old TVs, ready to start the day with a little news or Gilligan's Island, and instead see . . . nothing.  With a little advance warning, those folks can either upgrade to digital TVs or attach a government-subsidized adapter to the old one.  But some people -- many of them elderly, poor, or not fluent in English -- will be caught short.

The FCC wants to keep the numbers of these unfortunates to a minimum.  To that end it prohibited the manufacture and importation of analog-only TVs as of 2005-2007 (exact dates depended on screen size), and required that analog-only TVs offered for sale after last May carry a warning.  It also mandated certain upgrades to the V-chip circuitry.

 

Continue Reading...

FCC to Translator Applicants: "Never Mind"

As we reported here in early March, the Commission ordered applicants with more than 10 short-form translator applications still pending (from the 2003 filing window) to advise the Commission of which 10 applications the applicant wants to continue to prosecute.  All others would then be dismissed.  The deadline for those notices was Thursday, April 3. 

But five days after that deadline, the Commission has had a change of heart. In a public notice, the Commission has announced that the dismissal of FM translator applications has been suspended.

Continue Reading...

DTV Education Initiative Form Available; Deadline Looming

**CORRECTED AND UPDATED AS OF 5:00 P.M. - 4/1/08**

As reported yesterday, the rules for the DTV Education Initiative became effective on March 31, 2008. The FCC has also received final approval for the FCC Form 388 and, as of April 1, the Commission has posted the form on its webpage.

Heads up!!!  Form 388 is NOT available in CDBS.  Rather, it must be filed as a Report in MB Docket 07-148.  The FCC has made available two versions of the form - one in Microsoft Word, one in PDF.  The Word version DOES permit the user to fill in the form through the computer.  The PDF form is NOT interactive (at least as of this writing) - so if you want to use the PDF, you will need either to (a) print it out and fill it in by hand or typewriter or (b) configure it on your own to be interactive.

Continue Reading...