A Step-by-Step Guide to Webcaster Royalties

There's been a lot of talk about the agreements reached by SoundExchange, Inc. with the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) and with the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) that provide substitute royalty rates and playlist reporting requirements for eligible webcasters who elect to participate in these deals. 

The most common refrains we hear are: "What does this mean for me?” and, from the more practical-minded, “What do I have to do?"  These are by no means dumb questions, since the new agreements – and especially the SoundExchange/NAB deal – create multiple subcategories of webcasters, each with slightly different benefits and responsibilities. 

No worries. We here in the CommLawBlog bunker are prepared to walk you through the process, step-by-step. Literally.

We have prepared a series of interlinked informational slides to guide you along the path. By clicking on the links that apply to your own situation, you can wend your way through the Webcast Royalty Maze. (Don’t worry about making a mistake: you can go back at any time if you think you've answered a question wrong or if you think that you'd like to take advantage of some other available option.)

NOTEThis was created prior to the execution of settlement agreements in August 2009 that cover noncommercial webcasters and noncommercial educational webcasters.  If you are a noncommercial webcaster who might be eligible for one of these agreements, please look for an updated version of this step-by-step guide or contact us for more information.

So, let's begin with an easy one: If you are engaged in the non-interactive public performance of sound recordings by means of a digital audio transmission, click here

If you are not engaged in the non-interactive public performance of sound recordings by means of a digital audio transmission, then the statutory license for webcasting does not even apply to you.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.commlawblog.com/admin/trackback/117286
Comments (2) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Simple reader - March 27, 2009 4:30 PM

Interactive presentation is very cute. A little too cute.

I couldn't get past the third slide. I would prefer either just inline text, or a powerpoint presentation.

You can look at the other two blogs referenced in RAIN for a better format to present to busy readers.

Kevin Goldberg - March 27, 2009 4:37 PM

Thanks for the feedback. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "couldn't get past the third slide" -- does that mean you didn't find it easy to use or the links didn't work for you after that.

We do have a text-only summary of these changes and a long memorandum we provide to clients but also received requests for something very simple, so we came up with this. We thought about powerpoint but our computer folks suggested this version in the end.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.