DTV Transition Extension - June 12 is Now THE Date

DTV Delay Act signed by President. 

Word has just arrived that President Obama has signed the DTV Delay Act into law. That makes it official: the national DTV transition date has moved from February 17 to June 12. In case you've been stuck in a cave for the last couple of weeks, see our earlier posts (e.g., here and here) for descriptions of the nuts and bolts of the DTV Delay Act. And stay tuned to commlawblog.com for updates as the FCC continues to grapple with the administrative fall-out from Congress’s last-minute change of the deadline.

DTV Transition Update - 680+ Analogs Set To Turn Off Early

With just a week to go before the still-on-the-books February 17 DTV transition date, things at the FCC were continuing to percolate.

Still-on-the-books? Why, yes, as of this morning (Wednesday, February 11), it appears that the President had still not signed the DTV Delay Act into law. No one seriously doubts that he will sign it at some point, but it hasn’t happened yet, at least as far as we can tell from the White House web site. 

Despite the fact that the statutory deadline is thus technically still February 17 (at least until Obama signs off on the extension provision), the FCC is charging ahead as if the extension (to June 12) were a done deal. While it’s dicey business to assume that something is going to happen and act accordingly, the Commission is in a difficult spot here, thanks to Congress, so they’re probably entitled to some slack. (We hope that the Commission will be as understanding if/when we happen to get caught between a rock and a hard place and have to act on similar assumptions.)

As previously reported, the Commission has issued a blanket waiver permitting stations to turn off their analog as of February 17 upon appropriate notice to the Commission. (Of course, no such waiver is technically necessary unless/until the DTV Delay Act gets signed into law – but since the FCC is being forced to operate in the Land of Assumptions, the Commission expects the rest of us to join in the fantasy.) But in issuing that waiver, the Commission reserved the right to “limit or reconsider” it. On February 10, the Commission issued a public notice re-emphasizing the potential for “limit[ing]” or “reconsider[ing]” the waiver “in the event that the Commission determines that analog termination on February 17 by a station or group of stations is contrary to the public interest.”   

How might the FCC make that determination?

According to the notice, the waiver might get yanked “if, for example, [the Commission] finds that all or most of the stations in a market will terminate their analog service on February 17, and that the market is one in which many viewers are unprepared for the transition or at risk if the transition proceeds.” Along with the notice the FCC issued two lists identifying (a) all 680+ stations that have either already turned off or have given notice of intent to terminate analog operation by February 17 and (b) all U.S. TV stations, grouped by DMA, with those planning early termination highlighted. So now we all know the markets which will go entirely analog-free as of 2/17, and we know the markets where “most” (by which the Commission presumably means more than half) of the analog service will be shut off. 

But we don’t know whether any of those markets include “many” “unprepared” or “at risk” viewers. Nor do we have a clue how the FCC plans to make that call.

But once the staff has identified such situations, it

may require affected stations to submit additional information to explain and justify how their early termination advances the public interest. Such additional information can include significant economic, technical, contractual and other business reasons that support termination on February 17, and efforts being made to protect consumers from service disruptions. The Commission will scrutinize such information closely in light of the important interests at stake to determine whether a compelling case has been made.

Reality check: the Commission plans to inventory the readiness of viewers in markets nationwide and then notify possibly affected stations, and then those stations will pull together and submit showings of the “significant economic, technical, contractual and other business reasons” supporting early shut-down, and then the staff will “scrutinize” those showings, and then the staff might decide that the early-shut-down waiver should be somehow “limit[ed]” or “reconsider[ed]”. And all this is supposed to happen in seven days (i.e., February 11-17).

Oh, did we mention that February 16 is a Federal holiday? So of the seven available days, only four are business days.

Good luck with that.

It’s possible, perhaps likely, that in floating out the possibility of pulling the plug on the early-shut-down waivers, the FCC might just be blowing kisses in the direction of Congress – a For Display Only option which will not really be invoked, but which will make Congress feel good about things. We will know for sure in about a week. (From a practical perspective, it’s hard to imagine that the Commission believes that, after February 17, it will be able to order stations to resume analog service – but you never can tell.)

Meanwhile, the good folks at the NAB have assembled a tentative “pre-shutoff checklist” for stations planning to pull the plug market-wide. Their list contains a number of very useful (and highly advisable) suggestions, including:

  • select a short-term “market manager” who can serve as a liaison with the FCC and who can organize and coordinate responses to situations as they arise;
  • make sure that at least one (and ideally more, if not all) of the stations in the market is providing “nightlight” service;
  • organize and coordinate local call centers to handle viewer questions;
  • provide continued on-air coverage of the DTV transition, particularly immediately before and (for stations continuing in analog) after the shut-down;
  • monitor public reaction and readiness (through contacts with retailers, local civic and public safety organizations and the like)

Stations planning to take their analogs down next week would be smart to take the NAB’s advice on all these points.

Meanwhile, back at Congress, at least one version of the stimulus bill includes a provision for more money for DTV converter boxes.

Check back to CommLawBlog.com for updates.

DTV Extension: It Ain't Over 'Til The Paperwork's . . .

Almost immediately after the House finally passed the DTV Delay Act with its do-over vote on Wednesday, February 4, the Commission hustled out a new set of DTV transition procedures (on February 5), some of which require broadcaster action as early as Monday, February 9, and all of which are based on the assumption that the transition deadline has been officially moved back to June 12.

But hold your horses. Constitutional tradition – wait, it’s really more of a specific and express constitutional requirement, isn’t it? – provides that, with certain extraordinary exceptions, an Act of Congress doesn’t become law until the President signs off on it. And that had not happened, at least as of February 5, or even February 8.  

While nobody has any serious doubt about the outcome here – President Obama has made his support for the DTV delay abundantly clear – the problem is that he also has made a “commitment to introducing more sunlight into the lawmaking process by posting non-emergency legislation online for five days before signing it.”  Notwithstanding the FCC’s seeming sense of urgency, the White House apparently views the DTV Delay Act as “non-emergency”, since it has posted the Act on-line for public comment.

It’s not clear when the White House’s self-imposed five-day holding period started. If the first day was the date that the House passed the bill, then Obama could sign it into law as early as Monday, February 9. Of course, if the White House views its solicitation of public comment as anything more than 100% political charade, it may hold off at least a day or two so that it can review and consider (or at least pretend to have reviewed and considered) whatever comments may have been submitted – in which case the President may not ink the deal until later in the week. We shall see.

DTV Extension? June 12 Is Looking Like The New Date!

House Tries, Tries Again – and Comes Up With June 12

Word just in from Capitol Hill indicates that the House has passed the DTV extension bill by a resounding 264-158 vote (wait – aren’t those almost the same numbers that came up short in last week’s vote? Ahh, the miracles of the parliamentary process . . . ). The House reportedly accepted the language adopted by the Senate in S. 352, which provides for a We-Really-Mean-It-This-Time final date of June 12, 2009, after which analog television broadcasting will be gone. It also authorizes NTIA to re-issue DTV converter coupons to households which failed to redeem their coupons within the original 90-day life of the coupons. And, perhaps most important to many licensees who have been gearing up to dump their analog operations as of February 17 (which used to be the We-Really-Mean-It deadline), Congress’s action does not require stations to continue analog broadcasting all the way to June 12. Rather, analogs can be terminated prior to that date “so long as such prior termination is conducted in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission's requirements in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, including the flexible procedures established in the Matter of Third Periodic Review of the Commission's Rules and Policies Affecting the Conversion to Digital Television (FCC 07-228, MB Docket No. 07-91, released December 31, 2007).”

Next stop for the bill – 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, where the President must affix his John Hancock on the dotted line in order to complete the process and make it all legal. The smart money says that that is likely to happen as soon as tomorrow, February 5.

Then, of course, the real fun will begin, as the unfortunate folks at the FCC have to slam the brakes on the February 17 express train (with less than two weeks to go before that particular deadline, thank you very much), switch that train over onto the spur labeled June 12, and get it cranked back up to full speed again. The FCC’s staff, which has done an incredible job so far in the transition process, deserves better than this.

DTV Extension? Senate Says June 12 - AGAIN!

Looks like it’s mulligan time on Capitol Hill. As previously reported, the Senate passed a DTV Delay bill on Monday, January 26. However, also as previously reported, the House vote on a corresponding bill came up a tad short vote-wise on Wednesday, January 28.

Go on ahead, gang, why not tee it up again? Who’s looking, anyway?

Sure enough, in Congress as in life generally, if at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. So on Thursday, January 29, the Senate passed its DTV Delay bill . . . again. (Actually, the later bill – dubbed S. 352, not to be confused with S. 328 – included some modest, mainly cosmetic changes that do not alter the bottom line effect of the legislation.) The thinking appears to be that the House – when it gets back to work next week after the long Super Bowl weekend – will be able to take up the new bill again. This time, however, the House will presumably avoid the procedure that got it into a pickle the first time around – i.e., an expedited procedure that required a two-thirds vote which the bill’s sponsors couldn’t muster. But they did have more than a simple majority. So as long as the new bill is considered in a parliamentary process in which a bill can pass with a simple majority (and as long as the original “aye” votes hold), the DTV Delay should be back on track next week.

And none too soon, what with the February 17 deadline less than three weeks away.

Even if we’re all incredibly optimistic that the delay will pass, at this point it has not passed and, unless and until it does, February 17 will remain the date on which all affected TV stations should focus. That being the case, it’s important for the time being to stay the course, maintaining the schedule of DTV programming – PSAs, crawls, snipes, the works – as if February 17 is still the deadline, because it IS still the deadline. Since the industry as a whole has been marching toward that deadline for some time now, it should not be a big deal to keep at it for at least another week or so. (And if the deadline ends up not being extended, that just means we all stick to the schedule that we were already committed to.)

It seems to us that the real victims of this last-minute spasm of Congressional activity are the FCC staffers who must adjust to Congress’s whims. They have been struggling for years to meet the etched-in-stone February 17 date, and to their credit they have largely succeeded in getting all the players lined up to do so. But if the deadline gets extended, the staff will suddenly have to shift gears and figure out how best to factor the new deadline in. Good luck with that.

(Keep an eye out for a public notice from the staff providing guidance on what steps to take if the deadline does get extended.)

DTV Extension? House Says "Concentrate and Ask Again!"

This just in (at 1:04 p.m. on January 28): a 258-168 majority of the House has voted in favor of the DTV Delay Act, BUT that was NOT enough to pass the bill. It turns out that, because of some arcane parliamentary hocus-pocus involving proposed legislation placed on the House “suspension calendar” (we told you it was arcane), the DTV Delay Act needed a two-thirds majority in the House, and if you do the math, you’ll see that 258-168 doesn’t get you there. Word is that some in the House may now be considering various arcane parliamentary options (e.g., whether or not to bring the bill to the floor under a rule, whereby the bill would need to go through the Rules Committee – remember, we told you it was arcane) through which the bill might be adopted by a simple majority. Stay tuned.

DTV Extension? Senate Says June 12!

Trying to get a fix on exactly when the final DTV transition deadline will be has lately been a lot like trying to nail Jell-O to the wall. But in an effort to keep our readers up to date, we are pleased to report that the Senate has voted unanimously in favor of extending the deadline from February 17 to June 12. (Note: some press reports have characterized the extension as a “four-month” extension. Don’t be fooled. If the June 12 date holds, the extension will be for 115 days, not four months – since “four months” would take it to June 17.)

You can read the full text of the Senate bill here. While it extends the transition date, it expressly does not require stations to continue to operate in analog up to June 12. Earlier termination is permitted, as long as it occurs in accordance with Commission policies and rules (including those set out in the Third Periodic DTV Review released in December, 2007).

The bill also gives folks who received government-issued DTV converter box coupons but failed to use them another chance. Originally those coupons were issued on a two-per-household, use-them-or-lose-them basis, with a shelf-life of 90 days. A fair number of households apparently got their coupons but then didn’t cash them in, and the Senate has decided to give those folks another chance.

It looks like the House is going to bring a version of the bill to the floor for a vote, possibly as early as today (January 27). Stay tuned.

DTV Transition Extension - The Line(s) From Vegas

Apparently not content to let Congress and the incoming administration be the only ones to sow potential confusion about the DTV Transition date, Chairman Martin and Commissioner Adelstein took time over the weekend to send decidedly mixed signals to all concerned. As we have previously reported, despite the fact that, years ago, Congress set February 17, 2009, as the final Transition date, in recent days a serious case of the yips has plagued various folks, including high-ranking members of Congress as well as Team Obama. As a result, at this point it’s not clear when the Transition ball will ultimately drop into the hole.

The deadline is a statutory matter – that is, Congress expressly imposed it and the President signed it into law – so it’s up to our elected representatives to decide whether or not to change it. The FCC technically has no say in the date. Rather, the Commission must do what Congress tells them to do.

But that didn't stop a couple of the Commissioners from doing their best to muddy the already muddied waters just a little bit more.

Interviewed at the International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas on Saturday, January 10, Martin challenged the Conventional Wisdom Du Jour i.e., that delay in the transition is totally necessary – by suggesting that an extension of the deadline would cause confusion among viewers. His unsurprising point was that, since the TV industry has, at the insistence of the FCC, been pummeling audiences for months with the word that February 17 is THE Transition D-Day, viewers might be puzzled if, at this late date, that deadline turned out to be inoperative.

True enough, but the elected officials who have been making noises about changing the deadline probably know about that and still figure that an extension of the deadline is a good idea. So Martin’s statement of the obvious would likely have been of minimal consequence to the Proponents of Postponements (PoPs).

But Adelstein, also speaking at the Vegas show, felt compelled to stir the pot just a little more by chiming in that the DTV Transition “program has been badly mismanaged. It’s not ready for prime time.” Ouch! He bemoaned the lack of a “program in place in the field” or adequate “phone banks” to help viewers who might need assistance. Looks like he’s lining up with the PoPs.

This minor flare-up, having happened in Vegas, may just stay in Vegas. After all, the decision as to the deadline is one for Congress and the President, not the FCC. Moreover, Chairman Martin’s ability to sway anybody in Congress is already in the tank, if the less than flattering report about him issued by House Democrats last month is any indication. And while Adelstein’s Chicken Little negativism may be a bit overstated, we should all keep in mind that, once the new administration settles into the White House, Adelstein’s party will be in charge of things at the Commission. As a result, we can expect to see FCC-sponsored DTV phone banks getting beefed up starting soon after the Inauguration.

Stay tuned. We still have a month to go before February 17.

DTV Transition Extension: What's the Over/Under?

When it comes to inevitabilities, the February 17, 2009 DTV transition deadline has, in the minds of many, been right up there with death and taxes since Congress wrote that date into law three years ago. But as we said back in 2005 (when it looked like April 9, 2009, was a front-runner), we wouldn’t be betting the farm that the date might not be on the move again before the actual transition happens. And sure enough, we’re starting to hear rumblings that February 17 might have to step aside for some later date – to be determined.

The Washington Post is reporting (in its January 8, 2009 edition) that Consumers Union has urged delay in the transition because of concern that the General Public (a/k/a the Voting Public, a beast politicians prefer not to rile) may not be ready for it. While normally that kind of suggestion might trigger a big ho-hum among jaded observers accustomed to such PR moves, there’s more here: the Post also reports that a spokesperson for Rep. Edward Markey responded that “with the date looming, moving the date back certainly warrants further discussion and may be a wise choice”. Since Markey is the Chair of the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, the smart money figures that the prospects for some extension of the deadline may be looking up. Meanwhile, WashingtonPost.com is also reporting that Team Obama has jumped on the bandwagon and is urging Congress to hit the brakes on the transition. That should get the odds-makers’ attention.

Other factors influencing the handicapping include: (1) the recent announcement by NTIA that it’s already maxed out in the DTV converter coupon program; and (2) the rush-rush enactment of the Analog Nightlight Act; and (3) the equally rush-rush adoption by the FCC of the replacement translator program. This all may not rise to the level of Panic In The Streets, but it certainly reflects Spreading Perspiration Stains.

An extension at this point would be somewhat embarrassing – the transition process has been in the works for years, after all, so why aren’t we able to wrap it up on schedule, for crying out loud – but it would not be the end of the world. The television industry and the Media Bureau’s staff have all done their jobs and, despite the enormity of the task, they have all managed to get their end of the process teed up reasonably well for a February 17 transition. The Bureau staff and the industry are to be heartily congratulated for getting us to where we are.

To the extent that any problem may exist, it arises because of uncertainty about the extent of the public’s readiness for the change. If the politicians decide that a month or two more might improve that readiness, where’s the harm? Plus, that would give the newly-minted Congress a chance to crow loudly about how they stepped in at the last minute to save the day for all the Little People who had somehow miraculously managed to miss the governmentally-mandated Shock-and-Awe “education” campaign staged over the last year or so.  Given the relentlessness of that campaign -- designed to clue EVERYBODY into the transition -- one could wonder what more might be done during an extension that has not already been done.  But we'll leave that to our friends on Capitol Hill to decide.

In the meantime, stay tuned (using both analog and digital receivers, just to be on the safe side).

NTIA Wait Lists Coupon Requests

That loud clunking noise you heard a little while ago was the NTIA’s DTV converter coupon program hitting its upper spending limit. That’s right, it appears that all of the $1.34 billion allocated by Congress has been sucked up by DTV coupons already issued. So NTIA has announced that, until Congress slips it some more cash (or until it hits the Powerball), anyone sending in for a DTV coupon will be placed on a waiting list. Don’t call them, they’ll call you.

This is obviously disappointing news for anyone who held off until the last minute (maybe they expected Santa to leave coupons in their stockings), but it should not have been unexpected. The coupon program, already strained a couple of months ago, saw a huge uptick in requests in December. As a result of the overall numbers since the program started last year, NTIA is not currently in a position to issue any more new coupons. Instead, it will have to wait for already-issued coupons to expire (they have a 90-day shelf-life, use-‘em-or-lose-‘em; the expiration date is printed on the face of each coupon), which will then free up funds to cover the issuance of new coupons. NTIA estimates that about 350,000 coupons expire, unused, each week – but in December alone NTIA received new requests for more than seven million coupons, so late-requesters are probably in for a wait.

Of course, Congress could come to the rescue with additional funds. That may be in the works, but in the current transition mode between administrations, it’s likely to be difficult to get that particular spigot opened up in the immediate future. NTIA did indicate that, as matters now stand, if you are only just now filing for your coupons, you will almost certainly not receive them before February 17.

Meanwhile, if you are among the lucky ones who already have coupons, here’s a CommLawBlog tip. When you go to use your coupons, don’t cough them up until you are absolutely sure that you’re ordering what you want. One of our colleagues had the unhappy experience of ordering a couple of converters online. At the start of the transaction the merchant asked for the coupon info and PIN, which our trusting colleague provided. It turned out that other terms of the transaction (e.g., shipping costs) were not to our guy’s liking and he bailed on the deal, meaning that he did not buy any converters. But when he tried to use his coupons elsewhere, he found out, much to his chagrin, that the coupons showed up in the system as having already been cashed in. Oops.