Update: Effective Date for Expanded MedRadio Rules Set

Back in December we reported on the expansion of the Medical Device Radiocommunication Service (MedRadio) to permit use of 24 megahertz of spectrum in the 413-457 MHz range for wideband devices implanted in the body. The new rules have now been published in the Federal Register, which means that they become effective on February 27, 2012.

Sometimes the FCC Gets on Our Nerves

New rules allow communication with implanted devices that help restore function to damaged nerves and muscles.

The FCC has authorized the use of 24 megahertz of spectrum in the 413-457 MHz range for wideband devices implanted in the body. Part of the FCC’s MedRadio service, these devices will help treat neurological injuries and disorders by monitoring and activating nerves and muscles to restore sensation and mobility. The action adopts proposals the FCC laid out back in 2009.

The original proponent for the rules, the Alfred Mann Foundation, describes the technology as an “artificial nervous system” that uses electric signals to improve or replace the function of a nervous system impaired by mishap or disease. Patients who might benefit include those suffering from traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord injuries, and various neuromuscular disorders. A person might have several implanted devices that together make up a wireless network, coordinated by an external programmer/controller. Because the devices must transmit a lot of information in short bursts, they require substantial bandwidth, up to 5 MHz. The 400 MHz band is suitable because signals in this range can propagate through body tissues. Authorized power levels are very low, no more than 25 microwatts.

The new devices can operate in four bands: 413-419 MHz, 426-432 MHz, 438-444 MHz, and 451-457 MHz. These, needless to say, are already occupied (as is virtually all of the spectrum below about 50 GHz). Current users include private land mobile, public safety, TV news, and amateur operators. Some of these parties claimed the implanted devices would cause them harmful interference, but the FCC disagreed, based on test results in the record. Some also feared that if their equipment caused interference in the other direction (i.e., interfered with the implanted systems), they would have to turn down power so as to protect the well-being of persons who have the devices installed. The FCC addressed this concern by making the implanted devices “secondary” to other licensed users. In English, this means the new devices may not cause harmful interference to, and must accept all interference from, other licensed services.

Declaring the implanted devices to be secondary solves a legal problem, but does nothing to fix the underlying practical question. The FCC is probably right that a microwatt-level transmitter embedded in body tissue poses little interference threat to a licensed receiver. But we wonder about a person dependent on these devices who lives next door, say, to an amateur licensee operating at the maximum allowed power, which is 1500 watts. Legally, the implantee has no recourse if his internal network malfunctions. He is unlikely even to know that his ham neighbor is responsible for the problem. The rules require the external programmer/controller to monitor all four bands at least once per second and, if necessary, to move the entire network to a quieter band. To cover the case where none of the four bands is usable, the devices must be programmed to shut down in an orderly way. The small risk of that happening, says the FCC, is outweighed by the devices’ potential benefits.

There is also some small risk of interference among multiple people with these devices being congregated in a small area, as could happen in a medical facility. The FCC rejected proposals to require listen-before-talk circuits and contention-based protocols (which require competing systems to take turns). Instead it simply called on manufacturers to cooperate in setting standards for the industry.

Weak though they are, the device transmitters are too powerful to qualify as unlicensed devices. The FCC accordingly lumped them into the “Citizens Band” (CB) category. In theory a CB user requires a license, but need not actually apply for one. Anyone using the service with approved equipment is simply deemed to be licensed. Along with use by truckers (“10-4, Good Buddy”), the CB service also includes a host of other operations whose power is low enough individual licenses are not worth the bother.

Effective Dates Set For Wireless Mic Clear-Out Process

The FCC has received approval from the Office of Management and Budget to implement its new rules clearing wireless microphones out of TV Channels 52-69 (the 700 MHz band). We reported on the adoption of those rules last month. OMB approval affects some of the deadlines in the clearing-out process. Those deadlines are now as follows:

  • At any time on or after February 17, 2010, Public Safety and commercial licensees who are ready to occupy 700 MHz band channels may give notice to wireless microphone users to clear out.  (See Section 74.802(e)(2))
  • Effective February 28, 2010, anyone who sells or leases wireless microphones (or offers them for sale or lease) must provide a “Consumer Alert” on their websites, in their product catalogs, and on microphone packaging, using FCC-specified wording.  (See Sections 15.216 and 74.851(i)).
  • Effective June 15, 2010, any wireless microphone that operates above 698 MHz must be for export only and labeled that it may not be operated in the United States. (See Section 74.851(h)).

The June 12, 2010, deadline by which all wireless microphone users must stop operating on Channels 52-69 (698-806 MHz), remains unchanged.

Sometimes the FCC Just Gets Under Our Skin

As radio transmitters get smaller, they are turning up in the oddest places. Including people's innards, with implanted medical devices now sending out reports on conditions inside. These include cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators that have monitoring and reporting capabilities, and devices used for diabetic glucose monitoring and control.

Two recent FCC actions will facilitate this ongoing communication through the skin.

One is an expansion of the ten-year-old Medical Implant Communications Service, now renamed the Medical Device Radiocommunication Service, or MedRadio. The new rules increase the available spectrum for implants from 402-405 to 401-406 MHz. External, body-worn devices are also allowed in the newly added 401-402 and 405-406 MHz segments.

Power is limited to 25 microwatts. Each device must monitor the frequencies it intends to use before it transmits, except that units can just blast away (if that is the right word, at these power levels) using 100 or 250 nanowatts maximum, depending on frequency, with strict duty cycle limits.

The transmitters are “licensed by rule.” This means they are deemed to be licensed even though the user does not actually have a license – just like CB radios. In fact, to get around a pesky statute that limits license-by-rule to just a few services, the implanted radios are defined to be CB radios. Breaker One-Nine, good buddy, and how’s the spleen doing?

The order adopting the new MedRadio rules is here.  

In a related action, the FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking concerning “implantable neuromuscular microstimulation devices.” These would be multiple devices surgically installed in a person to communicate with each other, under control of an outside device, essentially operating as an artificial nervous system. Beneficiaries could include those with spinal cord injury, diseases such as multiple sclerosis, polio, cerebral palsy, and ALS, and combat injuries.

To handle these devices, the FCC proposes to make available one or more of the segments at 413-419, 426-432, 438-444, and 451-457 MHz. It also lays out ideas for operational and technical rules. The NPRM is here.

Maybe now men will finally get in touch with their inner feelings. By radio.