Come 'n' Get it: RUS Ready To Open Coffers Again

$700 million in low-interest loans available for would-be rural broadband providers

In 2009-2010, the Department of Agriculture’s Rural Utility Service (RUS) disbursed several billion dollars in loans and grants for broadband build outs as part of the controversial spending initiative flowing from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Now, hot on the heels of that spree, RUS has opened the gates for new applications for up to $700 million dollars in low-interest loans for broadband. The new funds have been made available by the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (a/k/a the 2008 Farm Act). Interested applicants may file as soon as they’re ready.

The purpose of the funding is similar to that of the 2009-2010 stimulus program: to subsidize the construction of broadband facilities in parts of rural America that are currently unserved or underserved in that regard.

Although RUS is accepting applications now, the actual appropriation for the program remains uncertain due to the inability of Congress to pass a final budget for 2011.   RUS finds itself in a bit of a bind since the funds, if they do become available, must be committed by the end of this fiscal year (i.e., by September 30, 2011). That leaves relatively little time for RUS to solicit, receive and process applications. While there is no guarantee that the funds will actually be in the cookie jar after applications are submitted, RUS obviously feels confident enough about the survival of the program to solicit applications. With the most recent (and likely last) Federal budget “continuing resolution” expiring on April 8, RUS should know by then whether it in fact has any money to lend.

Jaded veterans of the 2009-2010 stimulus program application process will find RUS’s latest program somewhat simplified. As before, the funds may be used for the construction, but not the operation, of broadband facilities. Acquisition of such facilities (apparently including spectrum for wireless broadband) is now a permitted use, whereas the stimulus program declared that taboo. 

Loans may be requested in amounts of between $100 thousand and $100 million, with interest rates set at either 4% or the government’s cost of borrowing.   Loan guarantees are also available.

Underserved areas are now defined as areas with fewer than two carriers providing broadband at a total speed of 3 Mbps (upload and download combined).   Unfortunately, prospective applicants are once again left to their own devices in trying to figure out whether any particular area has service providers that meet that definition.  

New loans are also forbidden in areas where RUS loans or grants for broadband have already been made or where an application is currently pending. Thus, if two applications come in for the same area, the second one in the door will remain in bureaucratic limbo until a decision is made on the first one. This provides incentive to act quickly. Thankfully, RUS is planning to make an online map available to prospective applicants so that this latter bit of information can be readily ascertained.

Other highlights of the program:

  • Applicants must show availability of equity totaling at least 10% of the capital necessary to fund the project from sources other than the RUS loan.
  • Detailed financial information for the applicant’s past three years must be provided, as well as projections of revenue over the next five years showing that the project is sustainable without further capital input.
  • A detailed network design must be supplied demonstrating proposed construction adequate to provide the projected broadband service threshold, the applicant’s ability to provide these services, the costs of construction and operation, and a timetable.
  • Broadband must be provided at speeds of at least 5 Mbps (total of upload and download speeds) subject to later adjustment if broadband speeds increase.
  • Areas eligible for funding must:

be rural (not in either: (a) a city, town or incorporated area with population of more than 20K or more; or (b) an urbanized area contiguous and adjacent to a city or town with population of more than 50K);

be underserved (at least 25% of the service area is served by one or fewer broadband providers and no part of the service area is served by three or more broadband providers);  and

have no overlap with previous RUS beneficiaries or with a currently pending RUS loan application.

  • Special consideration will be given to applications to serve Indian communities. Communities declared to be “substantially underserved trust areas” (i.e., lands held for Native Americans) qualify for waiver of many of the rules, such as reduced equity requirements and longer term loan repayment (up to 35 years).

There is no specific filing deadline for these applications, but since applications are generally processed first come, there is an advantage to filing early. Once the money is gone, it’s gone. And if someone else files for your area first, that application will be processed before yours.

A summary of the terms of the RUS program, together with links to (among other things) the application guide and related attachments, may be found here. If you would like more information about this opportunity, feel free to contact us.

BTOP/CCI Application Deadline Extended, Again . . . For Five Hours

New deadline for electronic filings only: March 26, 2010 at 10:00 p.m. EDT

Are you planning on filing an application for a Comprehensive Community Infrastructure (CCI) project in connection with the Second NOFA? NTIA has announced that the deadline for electronically-filed applications for CCI projects has been extended a generous five hours. The old deadline (which we reported here) of 5:00 p.m. on March 26 is now old news; the new deadline is 10:00 p.m. the same day. According to NTIA, “[t]he complexity of preparing an infrastructure application requires applicants to offer proposals that are truly comprehensive in scope”, and so “applicants may need the full business day on Friday, March 26, 2010, to finalize their proposals.” But the previous 5:00 p.m. EDT deadline would have meant that would-be applicants outside the Eastern time zone would be getting less than the full day. To be equitable, NTIA has now tacked on an additional five hours.

Note that this extension does not apply to any applications which are not electronically-filed. That means that if you’re planning on filing the old-fashioned way, on paper, your deadline is still 5:00 p.m. EDT on March 26 – and since electronic filing is the default requirement, any such horse-and-buggy filing will have to be accompanied by a waiver request.

Some, But Not All, BIP/BTOP Deadlines Extended

New BIP deadline: March 29; New BTOP deadline for CCI projects: March 26

NTIA and RUS have announced extensions of the deadlines for some, but not all, submissions in response to the Second Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) issued as part of the Big Money Hand-out made possible by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.  Applications for Broadband Initiatives Program (BIP) funding will now be due at RUS by 5:00 p.m. (ET) on March 29, 2010. Applications for Comprehensive Community Infrastructure (CCI) projects under the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) will now be due at NTIA by 5:00 p.m. (EDT) on March 26, 2010

It’s not clear why one agency opted for March 26 while the other opted for March 29, but would-be applicants should be sure to note that the deadlines for NTIA and RUS applications responsive to the Second NOFA are no longer identical.

Also, the extensions do NOT apply to requests for NTIA/BTOP funds for Public Computer Center projects or Sustainable Broadband Adoption projects. The deadline for applications for such projects remains 5:00 p.m. (EDT) on March 15.  Check out our blog post about the Second NOFA for further details about the different types of projects.

Second (and Last) NTIA/RUS NOFA Released

Billions in broadband stimulus cash up for grabs – Deadline for applications: March 15, 2010

In the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, known to some as the Gravy Train Act, but more generally known as the Stimulus Act, Congress allocated $2.5 billion to the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) and $4.7 billion to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). The money was to be doled out, in the form of grants or loans, to worthy projects designed to bring new or improved broadband service to America. As we reported last year, NTIA and RUS originally planned to make these awards in three tranches beginning in June, 2009 and ending before the September 30, 2010 award deadline imposed by the Stimulus Act.

Unfortunately, it’s harder to give out millions of dollars than you might expect. So far these agencies have managed to open only one application tranche, and have issued only a handful of grants.   Of course, they did get far more applications (2,200) than they had expected, which slowed things down. And the applications themselves required vast amounts of supporting data that was onerous in the extreme (the word “overkill” comes to mind) that had to be generated by the applicants and digested by the agencies. That slowed things down, too.

With the September 30 deadline fast approaching, each of these agencies has issued a second “Notice of Funds Availability” (NOFA) to distribute the remaining Stimulus Act funds for broadband projects.  Given the time constraints and the amounts of money already applied for, the third application window has been eliminated – meaning that this is the last opportunity to make a grab for any of this stimulus cash.    The deadline for filing applications for these funds is March 15, 2010. While applications can be submitted as early as February 16, there is no advantage in filing early other than beating the last minute rush.

Even if you are familiar with the NOFAs issued last year for the first tranche of funding, you still need to study these new NOFAs closely, because substantial changes have been made to the funding programs. Happily, many of these changes simplify what was universally understood to be an unnecessarily complex application process developed for tranche 1. Other changes relate to the prioritization of the awards.

The original approach (for the first tranche) allowed applicants to file a single application for funding from both BTOP (i.e., NTIA ) and BIP (i.e., RUS), effectively allowing applicants to play the field with one application. No longer. Under the second tranche NOFA, applicants must choose which program they want to file under. This is not a small matter, since the programs focus on very different broadband approaches:

NTIA: As before, NTIA administers a straight grant program (i.e., no loan component). It will award up to 80% of the qualified infrastructure construction costs, but requires applicants to come up with the remaining 20% from other sources. Once again, no operating costs will be funded with these funds. In this tranche, a total of $2.6 billion will be available, with the lion's share, $2.35 billion, allocated to “Comprehensive Community Infrastructure” (CCI) projects. These are primarily “Middle Mile” broadband projects. The remainder of the money will be split between “Public Computer Center” (PCC) projects (at least $150 million) and “Sustainable Broadband Adoption” (SBA) projects (at least $100 million).   Almost any domestic entity is eligible to receive a BTOP grant, although local governments and state agencies are cautioned to determine their qualifications under state law to build and operate the facilities proposed in a BTOP application. Prior blog articles have addressed this eligibility issue. 

1.     “Last Mile” and “Middle Mile” Projects. In the first tranche, BTOP funds were available for both “Last Mile” projects and “Middle Mile” projects, with no particular emphasis of one over the other. This time, the focus will definitely be on “Middle Mile” projects (i.e., those systems that connect "Last Mile" distribution systems to an Internet point-of-presence or provide interoffice transport, backhaul or special access which furthers economic development). You can ask NTIA for money for a “Last Mile” project, but don’t expect to get the money unless (a) it is ancillary to a “Middle Mile” project and (b) the “Last Mile” component costs 20% or less than the total capital cost of the project. Instead, NTIA and RUS urge that you seek funding for Last Mile projects through the RUS’s BIP program (described below). Note well: NTIA will not fund a Middle Mile project in any area where RUS has already made a Middle Mile award with Stimulus Act funds.

In this funding round, NTIA wants to direct the grants to projects that serve community institutions. So the perfect application would involve a public-private partnership proposing a Middle Mile solution to “community anchor institutions” (e.g., public safety service, community colleges and the like) in economically distressed areas which are presently unserved or underserved, and relying on federal funds for 70% or less of the capital cost. The greater the deviation from that ideal, the less likely is the funding.

Many actual and potential applicants in the first tranche complained about the complexity of the application, and NTIA felt their pain. Several of the requirements of the last application round, such as engineering certifications, technical feasibility showings and budget reasonableness showings, have been eliminated or will be requested only if an application is down-selected for final review. Moreover, applicants are no longer confined to “unserved” or “underserved” areas.  Individual awards are expected to be in the $5 million to $150 million range.     NTIA and RUS have pledged to make all award decisions for the first round by the end of February, but prospective Round 2 applicants may not know until then whether there is a conflicting prior award in their target area.  

2.     “Public Computer Center” Projects. “Public Computer Centers” are places that provide broadband access to the general public or a specific vulnerable population, such as low-income, unemployed, aged, children, minorities, and people with disabilities. Think places like community colleges, libraries, schools, youth centers, employment service centers, Native American chapter houses, community centers, senior centers, assistive technology centers for people with disabilities, community health centers, and Neighborhood Network Centers in public housing developments. NTIA expects to make PCC awards to enhance the availablility of broadband in these facilities in the $500 thousand to $15 million range. 

3.    “Sustainable Broadband Adoption” Projects. This is the catch-all category for creative means of promoting broadband adoption. NTIA expects to fund innovative projects that promote broadband demand, including projects focused on providing broadband education, awareness, training, access, equipment, or support, particularly among vulnerable population groups that traditionally have underutilized broadband technology.   SBA awards will be in the $500,000 to $15 million range. 

RUS: The BIP program provides grants, loans, or grant/loan combinations. As before, RUS will award up to 100% of a project’s qualified infrastructure construction costs. Once again, no operating costs will be funded with BIP funds. Typical awards will be 75/25% grant/loan combinations, although projects that request a higher percentage of loan funds will receive a preference. This ratio differs from the available mix of grants and loans for the last tranche, in which 100% grants were available for areas that were entirely “remote” from urbanized areas and entirely unserved, and in which the grant portion of a grant/loan combination for non-remote areas could not exceed the size of the loan portion.   The much-criticized "remote" designation has been abandoned. 

While BIP loans must be secured with first priority liens on the assets purchased with the BIP money, RUS has dropped the controversial requirement that all of an applicant's assets (regardless of whether they were acquired with BIP money) must be subject to first lien in favor of RUS.   RUS will now agree to share its first lien position with other senior lenders on terms acceptable to RUS.  

In this tranche, approximately $2.2 billion will be made available. Reflecting the different focus of the BIP program, $1.7 billion is devoted to Last Mile projects with only $300 million available for Middle Mile projects. Of the remaining $200 million, up to $100 million will be made available for a new category called “Satellite” projects and up to $5 million will be available for two new categories called “Rural Library Broadband” and “Technical Assistance” projects. This leaves a balance of $95 million that will be held in reserve. 

Almost any domestic entity is eligible to receive a BIP grant, although local governments and state agencies are again cautioned to determine their qualifications under state law to build and operate the facilities proposed in a BIP application.

1.     “Last Mile” and “Middle Mile” Projects.  In this funding tranche, the emphasis will be on “Last Mile” projects (i.e., projects predominantly intended to provide broadband service to end users).  Although money is still available for Middle Mile projects, RUS has stressed that basically only existing RUS borrowers should apply for such projects.    RUS will prefer those Last Mile applications that propose to serve unserved households in remote rural areas, with high broadband speeds, discounted rates to community facilities and low cost per passed premises, where the applicant has a strong management team, has borrowed from RUS in the past and is a socially and economically disadvantaged small business concern. Further preference will be given to those proposals in which the ratio of BIP funding to new equity is lower, and to those proposals where the ratio of BIP loan money to BIP grant money is higher. Middle Mile projects will be evaluated with the same criteria, except that the RUS will look at the throughput to interconnection points and will not consider the cost per passed premises.

Unlike the NTIA, which has made the initial application process less burdensome, the RUS has compressed its two-part application process into a single application. That means that there is a lot more involved in preparing the BIP application. RUS will still require applicants to provide technical diagrams, a project timeline, and the certification of a professional engineer. 

RUS did loosen some filing restrictions. As before, a Last Mile service area must be at least 75% rural, but now it qualifies as underserved if less than 50% of the service area premises currently have access to broadband at speeds faster than 5 Mbps (combined up and downstream). This is a significant change from the gating criteria applied to the first tranche of BIP funds, where the proposed funded service area had to be an at least 75% “unserved” or “underserved” rural area and the broadband service metrics for incumbents were more easily met. RUS has also added an efficiency standard: federal assistance for Last Mile projects may not exceed $10,000 per passed premises (subject to waiver).

2.    “Satellite” Projects. “Satellite” projects are those that use satellites to provide broadband service to unserved, rural premises, either by: funding customer premises equipment (at no cost to the user); funding terrestrial equipment (at no cost to the user); and/or providing discounted broadband service (with at least a 25% discount for at least one year). The country will be divided into eight regions, and applicants will be eligible to serve any one or more of them. The details of this funding program will be revealed in the near future through the release of an RFP. In effect, there will be a Round 2-and-a-Half to receive applications for this money and the two following programs, all of which are ancillary or supplementary to the main projects funded in Rounds 1 and 2.

3.     “Technical Assistance” Projects. Under this category, RUS will make grants to fund the development of regional broadband development strategies in rural areas. The concept is that the awardee will work in public/private partnership to develop a USDA-approved regional plan to provide broadband service in rural areas that remain “critically unserved”.  In addition, technical assistance plans may be submitted to other federal agencies. Technical assistance grants are limited to $200,000 per grant and are available to those who receive an award for a Last Mile, a Middle Mile or a Satellite project through applications submitted in the first or second rounds.

4.     “Rural Library Broadband” Projects. This is another grant program used to reimburse the awardee for the costs of connecting one or more rural libraries to the broadband system. This grant program is available to those awarded BIP funds for a Last Mile, Middle Mile or Satellite project through application submitted for the first or second round, and need not be requested until after the RUS issues an RFP. 

There are, of course, many other details and nuances involved in planning a project for the funding of NTIA or RUS that simply cannot be covered in this overview. If you desire further information on this upcoming funding application process, please contact one of the attorneys in the Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth Stimulus Group.

FHH Forms Broadband Stimulus Group

Fletcher Heald & Hildreth, LLC, has formed a Broadband Stimulus Group to assist prospective applicants seeking to participate in the Broadband Initiatives Program (BIP) and/or the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP). Those programs are being implemented by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (dubbed the Stimulus Package by many). As outlined in a Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) released in early July, $4 billion in funding is being distributed in the current round of funding. The application window for grants or loans in that round opens July 14 and closes August 14.

The FHH Broadband Stimulus Group is comprised of 11 FHH attorneys familiar with the NOFA process and the broadband technology issues which must be addressed in that process. They kept a close eye on the Congressional deliberations that led up to the enactment of the Stimulus Package, and they have tracked the progress of the NTIA and RUS activities in this area since the Stimulus Package was signed into law. They are familiar with the particular areas likely to spell the difference between success and failure in the application process, and they stand ready to provide advice and assistance to applicants who want to take advantage of the opportunities which the BIP and BTOP offer. FHH Broadband Stimulus Group members also have extensive familiarity with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), the system of rules and policies which underlies government funding activities.

Established in 1936 – one year after the Federal Communications Commission commenced operation – Fletcher Heald & Hildreth has served the telecommunications industries with valuable insight, guidance and counsel for more than 70 years. The members of the FHH Broadband Stimulus Group have a combined total of more than 200 years of practice experience in the highly specialized field of communications law and regulation. With extensive connections throughout relevant governmental offices, Group members will have access to the most up-to-date information necessary to formulate plans and strategies for the most effective navigation of the BIP/BTOP process.

Members of the FHH Broadband Stimulus Group include: Donald Evans; Joseph Di Scipio; Tom J. Dougherty; Paul Feldman; Jeffrey Gee; Scott Johnson; Mitchell Lazarus; Francisco Montero; Lee Petro; Raymond Quianzon; and Kathleen Victory.